read also: KhaleejTimesOnline “Anti-fraud Law Made Tougher”
read also GulfNews
Abu Dhabi’s own cost of insuring its debt against default has soared, from just less than $100,000 per $10 million, to more than $177,000. And while this number fluctuates with the desert winds, there’s no guarantee that Abu Dhabi will keep forking out money to save its emirate cousin. For now, though, the prospect of rising costs on its own borrowings appears to have galvanised Abu Dhabi into providing more cash to Dubai. Stock markets swelled after Abu Dhabi’s payment of $10 billion to its neighbour, with Abu Dhabi's stock market clambering 7.9%, while Dubai’s benchmark index rallied 10%, the biggest single-day gain in more than a year. But this remains far below its level before Dubai World announced it wanted a hold on debt.
Reuters quotes Abu Dhabi people who say most of the über-emirate’s credit flow was too big, government-backed entities in Dubai, which helped collateralise Abu Dhabi's own late entry into the wedding-cake architectural stakes.
"During those years, the property market was still in its infancy in Abu Dhabi, so like other banks here, we, too, diverted our credit to Dubai," one Abu Dhabi bank executive said. "We have to face the stress that will be caused to our balance sheet and profit and loss account due to this exposure to Dubai World and associated companies because it is a default. Yes, we will have to take more provisions."
No one yet knows where the debt really resides.
Western banks appear to have some $12 billion of exposure to Dubai’s unfinished building frenzy.
There’s a sprinkling of Islamic sukuk bonds, such as the one that funded Nakheel’s $4.1 billion of due debt.
But the market wants to know if Abu Dhabi’s latest $10 billion was a gift, or a loan, or came from the proceeds of a veiled asset sale.
Abu Dhabi recently launched a push to improve transparency and raise money overseas, to help fund its own 20-year development programme. And so far, the emirate has raised about $8 billion this year on international credit markets.
But last week, ratings agency Moody's placed the credit ratings of several big Abu Dhabi companies on review for a possible downgrade, citing uncertainty over government support. And in the meantime, rival agency Fitch downgraded Dubai Bank, and also Tamweel – the largest provider of UAE real estate financing. It also downgraded Bahrain's TAIB Bank.
Another motivation for Abu Dhabi helping out Dubai World is the company's Dubai port operations, which it needs to market as a dependable global transport hub.
Dubai has got off lightly to date. But if the property market doesn’t return soon, hundreds of billions of dollars worth of skyscrapers and palm-shaped islands will remain unfinished hulks amid the dunes and warm waters off Dubai’s coastline.
more.The ruler of Dubai hit out at international investors yesterday as his government's impecunious investment vehicle revealed plans to restructure $26bn of its debts.
Sheikh Mohammed al-Maktoum said: "They do not understand anything."
After days of uncertainty that sent shudders throughout the world's stock markets, Dubai World finally unveiled plans to address the liabilities of its two property ventures – Nakheel and Limitless – after midnight on Monday night.
The timing of Dubai's request for a debt standstill, on the eve of the four-day Eid holiday, drew criticism from financial communities across the globe.
But in his first public comments since the crisis broke, Sheikh Mohammed had harsh words for investors and remained bullish about Dubai's economy. "We are strong and persistent," he said. "It is the fruit-bearing tree that becomes the target of [stone] throwers."
more... The Independet
Nakheel has asked for trading in all three of its listed Islamic bonds to be suspended. Only the first, which was issued in 2006 and is due to mature December 14, was guaranteed by parent Dubai World. The liability on the subsequent two bonds, which have a total face value of $1.7 billion and mature in 2010 and 2011, appears to be limited to Nakheel itself.
The Dubai property developer’s 2008 accounts show $41.5 billion of assets and $17.5 billion of liabilities — a net asset value of $24 billion. But real estate prices in the emirate have fallen around 50 per cent in 2009.
That means Nakheel, which funded some of the emirate’s most outlandish projects, could easily now have a negative equity value of $5.5 billion.
The equity value at parent Dubai World, which had liabilities of $59 billion at the end of 2008, is also likely to be negative. Its portfolio of 10 companies looks mostly troubled. However, Dubai World does hold 77 per cent of publicly-listed ports operator DP World. That was worth $5.1 billion on November 25, just before Dubai World announced its intention to restructure.
Nakheel’s foreign creditors shouldn’t get excited about their recovery prospects.
To get a lawsuit against Dubai World off the ground, 75 per cent of Nakheel’s bondholders have to agree. But the majority of creditors are local banks, which are likely to accede to any request to roll over Nakheel’s debt — even if the capital structure remains unsustainable, according to one ratings analyst. And even if local lenders joined in, Dubai’s law might not support a claim that forced the sale of the assets of government-related entities.
Lawyers agree the restructuring of Nakheel and its parent will be a test case. That makes Dubai World’s guarantee look less than solid.
original source Wall Street Journal
Dubai 2 December 2009
Finally, a chink of light. Dubai World has belatedly provided some of details on its planned debt restructuring.
But for investors the situation still resembles a darkened room, where the outlines of the furniture are now visible but little else. And for Dubai itself, there is more than just the future of $26 billion of debt at stake. The emirate's credibility as a financial center and its ability to continue financing good businesses, such as ports operator DP World, will hinge on its handling of the crisis.
Tuesday brought some good news. The $26 billion of debt affected is less than the $60 billion feared last week. Even so, questions linger. The restructuring process will include Dubai World itself and property developers Nakheel World and Limitless World. Analysts at Barclays Capital have identified $8.5 billion of debt at Nakheel, $5.5 billion at Dubai World and $1.2 billion at Limitless. That still leaves $10 billion unaccounted for. It may be in bilateral bank loans where there is no public disclosure. But it still leaves creditors unsure of their position.
It is also encouraging that Dubai World intends to adopt a policy of regular communication, though again the process lacks detail. For example, it is unclear whether the six-month standstill requested from creditors is voluntary or enforced. Given the looming Nakheel maturity -- just two weeks away -- it will be a challenge to secure creditor agreement in advance. If some lenders reject a stand-still it could trigger another bout of uncertainty and bondholders are organizing themselves for battle: a group holding 25% of the Nakheel bonds has hired Ashurst as a legal adviser.
Dubai's strategy relies on ringfencing certain key businesses from the general restructuring -- possible because of the lack of cross guarantees in the Dubai World group. For example, Ports & Free Zone World, which includes port operator DP World and P&O Ferries, is now clearly excluded from the process. But the initial lack of clarity on this issue has already cost Dubai Inc. a swathe of ratings downgrades. Of Moody's six ratings on Dubai companies, four are now junk.
The history of debt restructurings suggests that investors will not be scared off Dubai forever. Russia, for example, returned as an oil-fuelled darling of international investors even after its sovereign default in 1998 and amid continuing corporate governance and transparency problems.
If Dubai handles the painful process sensibly, it will emerge chastened from the experience, but not necessarily a spent force. The infrastructure built during the bubble will not vanish. The emirate now has to prove its status as one of the most western-friendly places to do business in a region still attractive for its massive oil wealth. If it can do so, Dubai will be down, not out.
Write to Richard Barley at richard.barley@dowjones.com
In a region where a man's word already carries outsized weight, the blunt-spoken sheikh's charisma had been built on the credibility of his pronouncements. It must be painful indeed for him to be seen as backtracking.
Sheikh Mohammed may be calculating that Dubai's foreign policy freedom is more valuable than its financial reputation.There is logic in this.
Abu Dhabi bailout.Article Controls
In February this year, following Dubai's difficulty in refinancing a $3.8 billion loan, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Central Bank, backed by Abu Dhabi, subscribed to a $10 billion bond, with interest rates set at 4%. However, earlier this month, it became apparent that Dubai would need a much bigger capital injection, especially given that its largest property developer--Nakheel, a subsidiary of Dubai World--was due to refinance a $3.5 billion Islamic sukuk bond on December 14.
Sovereign default ?
Although not technically an example of a sovereign default, the request has been viewed as such. The agencies have thus downgraded most government-backed Dubai companies and entities either to below investment grade or to junk status.
Political collapse ?
If Abu Dhabi does not mount a serious rescue operation, creditors are likely to seek legal redress against the defaulting Dubai government:
--In this scenario, 'Dubai Inc.' will be widely regarded as bankrupt and the ruling Al-Maktoum family held responsible, due to the 'blurred lines' between the government and the wealth of the ruling family.
--There would also be political ramifications. It would be unfeasible for Sheikh Mohammed or Sheikh Hamdan to remain in power following such a massive loss of prestige.
--It will do so only under very strict conditions, since it will be reluctant to pour money into rescuing failed projects.
--It will thus begin to dictate terms to Dubai, and almost certainly seek to centralize power in the UAE federation and rein in Dubai's autonomy.
--However, given the political culture of the Gulf states, such moves are likely to be made discretely, in order to allow the Dubai ruling family to save some face.
The Ruler of Dubai has told the emirate’s critics to ‘shut up’.
His remark was directed at people who have tried to suggest there is a wedge between the emirates of Dubai and Abu Dhabi after Dubai drew a $10 billion emergency loan from the UAE central bank.